<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mr. Ato &#187; brain dumping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrato.com/tag/brain-dumping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrato.com</link>
	<description>Politics, culture, ethics and more from the 24th century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 03:26:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hard week at the university, traditional classes still worth it</title>
		<link>http://www.mrato.com/2008/10/12/hard-week-at-the-university-traditional-classes-still-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mrato.com/2008/10/12/hard-week-at-the-university-traditional-classes-still-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MrAto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain dumping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuro-learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrato.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another week done, another crop of students to teach. I often am intrigued and happily surprised by the number of kids coming in for traditional learning. I, of course, am a big proponent of traditional learning. Why? Lets find out. We all know that with the advancement of technologies, people are able to learn anything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another week done, another crop of students to teach. I often am intrigued and happily surprised by the number of kids coming in for traditional learning. I, of course, am a big proponent of traditional learning. Why? Lets find out.</p>
<p>We all know that with the advancement of technologies, people are able to learn anything in a matter of minutes. Want to be an electrical engineer? No problem, pay a high fee, go to a education clinic, and you&#8217;ll know it as if you went to school. Or so they say.</p>
<p>I once decided to have this technique done. I thought to myself, when the technology first came out, that I should give this a chance. I am by no means an anti-technological zealot, i hate those guys, and am always very open to the latest advances. So I went down a clinic, plugged myself in and requested the historical topic of the 23rd century Martian politics. It was a historical topic that I never really studied. As such, it would make an excellent experiment point. I could take what I learn from the brain dump and compare it to my traditional education and see which one is a better education.</p>
<p>Now, of course this really wasn&#8217;t a scientific experiment. It&#8217;s all based on my level of objectivity when comparing the two educations. But, it&#8217;s about as close as I could get without a grant. It would have to do. The procedure itself is, as i&#8217;m sure you all know, very quick and simple. Put on a neuro-hat, sit back, relax and an hour later you&#8217;re done. How it works, beats the hell out of me. But, it does. And the results?</p>
<p>Lousy. Did I now know all about martian politics? Yes. Did I learn anything about martian politics? I would have to say no. What does that mean right? It means this. I once had a student who was very smart. I suspect he was augmented but you can&#8217;t opening say such things. He <em>knew</em> everything in my class. What I mean is, after the semester as done, he knew all the facts, knew all the dates, knew all the talking points. If someone asked him for a fact, he had it. But, he didn&#8217;t know a thing. If asked, what did all those facts mean, he was clueless. What does it matter if he knew the date of the bombing of New New York, he couldn&#8217;t answer the question of why it was bombed. His facts were factual. But there was no meaning behind it.</p>
<p>Human history is filled with facts. It is also filled with nuances. Subtleties that can not really be quantified. It is not a fact that a leader felt a certain way. This is a subjective point and one open for debate. It is a fact that a leader acted in a certain way.</p>
<p>So, when I say I knew the facts I did. But, I didn&#8217;t really know why or how those facts knit together. After my brain dump at the clinic, I knew the dates of elections, I knew about the riots, I knew about the failed terraforming bills. What I didn&#8217;t know was what led up to those elections, riots, and failed bills. The dump was only factual there were no nuances.</p>
<p>Lets face it, Sentients of all kinds are simply more complicated than a list of facts. We are a mix of emotions, imperfections, you name it. It takes an understanding of those imperfections to get a full and broad view of the topic.</p>
<p>Now, the brain dumping is fine for factual content. Want to know something, it can provide it. Want to learn something, it can not. I did, however, take what I was given and attend several lectures and classes on martian history. It was good to have those facts and then discuss them, debate them, among fellow students.</p>
<p>Brain dumping simply isn&#8217;t a substitute for traditional learning. All of those degrees being given out by education clinics, I feel, are not worth the paper they are printed on.  Traditional, four year degrees are still the way to go. And I think we are seeing some backlash in several industries and a return to the notion that traditional degrees are more valuable. It&#8217;s the life experience&#8217;s, the debates, the interaction with other students that is the real learning experience, not the facts. Even before brain dumping, you could just memorize facts, regurgitate them on a test and get a degree. It&#8217;s just now that technology has been created to speed up the memorizing factor. Take my advice, don&#8217;t do it. Spend the four years, don&#8217;t cut corners, you&#8217;ll be better for it. And as my list of papers to grade can attest, lots of young kids are taking this route. I even have two AI&#8217;s and three Cy&#8217;s, limited augmentations, in my class. I think it&#8217;s great.</p>
<p>Well, back to grading papers and watching low-grav sports. Love Sundays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mrato.com/2008/10/12/hard-week-at-the-university-traditional-classes-still-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

